|
Permanent
Direct or Contract Consulting Employment?
Have you got
what it takes to be a contractor or do you believe that a direct career
with a reputable company is simply more stable and rewarding?
To some people, the ability
to move to different work environments within their chosen discipline has
enabled them to hone their skills in the latest cutting edge technologies.
At the same time, because of their specialty they have been able to
command compensation far in excess of what they would have in a direct
position. On the other hand, other people have found that remaining with a
company in which their skills are recognized and who have contributed to
the company's success as a member of a dedicated team, can be rewarded in
a variety of ways. They may receive stock options that yield valuable
returns as the company's fortunes evolve or they may receive promotions to
senior positions of authority and influence within the organization.
It is true to say however,
that consulting or contracting is a trend that shows no sign of abating.
In fact there is a massive consolidation going on today within the IT
consulting industry in which large firms are swallowing up smaller firms
across the globe and especially here in the USA. What is driving this
phenomena and why are corporations hiring contract staff instead of
permanent employees?
Let's look at a fictitious
company by the name of Wellington Boots Galore International, or (WBGI).
In the mid-eighties downturn of the economy WBGI had fired many of its
employees including programmers within its IT department. Gradually the
economy improved and the company began to do better. However the Board was
in no hurry to hire new employees, and with cost cutting measures and more
efficient use of existing resources they were able to improve their
bottom-line. They also brought in the latest client/server technology and
reduced their dependence on a mainframe computer system.
It quickly became obvious
that cutting edge software and applications development was going to be
needed to maintain the corporation's new found efficiency. However,
instead of calling back their laid off programmers (who were mostly
mainframe types and subsequently obsolete) they needed the special skills
of programmers who had experience with the new software packages driving
the client/server engines.
It was at this point that a
paradigm shift occurred. WBGI felt it would be uneconomical to hire a team
of programmers to develop a set of applications over a period of say 12
months and then have little or nothing for them to do after that. They
sub-contracted instead, various programmers from 2 or 3 contract
consulting companies who employed the programmers for the period of the
project, in this case 12 months. The hourly billing rates were far higher
than any salaries WBGI would have paid to regular employees but after the
project was completed the programmers would be gone without further cost.
The programmers themselves meanwhile were paid handsomely by the
consulting companies. In some cases they were getting $45 per hour (or
$90K p.a.) in place of $40K to $50K p.a. when they were previously
full-time employees. The contract programmers were responsible for their
own tax and medical obligations and for getting to the client site. Over
the past few years many corporations like WBGI have have similar
structures in place that enable them to develop products or applications
on a project by project basis with a corresponding saving in permanent
headcount.
Today however, many
consulting companies have medical, vacation, and 401K benefits for the
period the contractor is engaged. Some contracts include paying for the
contract programmer to be flown home every week-end and hotel expenses
paid while at the client site. Companies such as WGBI are not permitted to
hire individuals as contract labor due to a ruling (1706) by the IRS and
they must therefore use contract consulting companies. This is done to
ensure that contractors are employed as W2 employees and their
withholdings are properly remitted to the Treasury. The penalty for
failure to comply with 1706 is severe and has the potential for creating
an opportunity for the IRS to investigate a corporation and put them under
severe scrutiny.
Nevertheless, contract
programmers are assured of legal conformity when employed by consulting
companies and do not have to worry about General Liability insurance,
Workers Compensation etc. Therefore, if you have solid skills in a
discipline that's in demand and you have a desire to be more independent
while earning significantly higher compensation, contracting your services
could be the way to go.
On the other hand if you
are more comfortable with what you feel is the security of a career
position with one company there are of course still many opportunities
available. There are still plenty of firms with stable work environments
and excellent career paths. Many of these organizations offer attractive
benefits and sometimes the added allure of stock options can lock in a
person's loyalty with the promise of potential future value. The latter is
particularly attractive if the company is a successful start-up and
eventually goes public.
So, whether you contract
your services to multiple clients or settle for a career position with one
company, make sure that you maintain or enhance your level of skills to
meet the current demands of shifting technology trends.
David E. Huntley,
CPC - President/CEO
Huntley Associates
(Dallas), Inc
Current
Tip Archive
of Previous Tips
|